Weather: Sunny and warm with a light, following wind |
Distance covered today: 18.5km ( 11.5mi) |
Last night's B&B: Armeria Bed & Breakfast |
% Complete: Cumulative distance: 86.8%: 143.2km |
GPS satellite track of today's route: Day 7(click!) |
My anxieties about the surge-damaged coastal path proved
groundless. I met a couple of posh
Londoners in a café in Blakeney, and my concerns about the path came up in
conversation. They assured me that they had just come along the affected bit of
path in the opposite direction, and though there were signs and fences,
everyone was just ignoring them. In the
event the path has had extensive repairs, with new boardwalks installed in
places and all the earthworks repaired. I can only imagine that the path remains
closed because some jobsworth in ‘elf and safety hasn’t had the time to get up
here from London to give the works the thumbs up. I met some National Trust
workers along the way, and even they didn’t object to my presence or that of the
hordes of holiday-makers traipsing illegally along the trail. It is interesting how mass action seems to
confer legitimacy on what is clearly illegitimate behaviour.
I was thinking about this and relating it to other examples,
like the current mass action of the politicians against the BBC. First there
was this move that transferred the cost of supporting the World Service from
the Foreign Office to the Beeb. Then,
lately, there has been this multi-party supported move to decriminalise
non-payment of the licence fee.
Although it means so much more to me, I suppose there is an
argument that the BBC is just like any other utility and I don’t get charged in
the criminal courts when I don’t pay my gas bill. The difference is that if I
don’t pay my gas bill, the gas man cuts off the gas, but there is no way the
BBC can prevent me from continuing to watch telly if I don’t pay my licence. Millions of people will simply stop paying,
and even if the Beeb prosecutes some of them in the civil courts, the overhead
involved and the non-payment of fines will overwhelm the system. This will
force the BBC to move to a set-top box subscription service, so that they can
withdraw service for non-payment. That will make it have to fight for customers
in direct competition with the likes of Sky, which is what Murdoch wants, and
there lies American TV. I’m not arguing
that the Americans don’t make some high quality TV productions; they do, but
anyone who has lived there knows that in the main, the dross that is produced
is stultifying in the extreme. As for
radio, the subscription option isn’t open, so the only answer is advertising,
and that prospect is simply horrifying.
Even the transfer of the costs of the World Service from the
Foreign Office to the BBC is highly questionable. When I lived overseas, I used hungrily to
listen to the Beeb, whether it was to receive news of the latest coup in an
adjacent country or the latest score in the then First Division. I understand
only too well what the World Service meant to the residents of dictatorships
across the world from Mandela to Aung San Suu.
The question though, is who should pay for it? The motivation for the
World Service in the first place was to spread Western values of democracy and
the rule of law, and equally to promote Britain in the eyes of the world as a
beacon of those liberal values. Apart from the recipients of that vital
information, the main beneficiaries of the ensuing goodwill were presumably the
citizens of the UK. It seems therefore
that the tax system rather than BBC licence fees should bear the cost (it’s
also a lot less regressive). In fact it
seems to defy logic that when the politicians are trying to marginalise the BBC
into being just another subscription competitor in an open market, they are
simultaneously saddling it with the cost of propagating the values of the UK
body politic to the wider world! Am I
alone in perceiving this immense contradiction!
I suspect that the answer lies in the political ravages of
the Murdoch press, especially after Levison. Politicians need Murdoch support
and that of the press in general. The
press recognise that unless they make the running now, they will disappear
under the onslaught of the internet. The
BBC remains a high quality, ‘free’ competitor (you pay the licence for entertainment
and you get your news for free!), and it is much more vulnerable than the
internet. An unholy alliance develops
between the press and the politicians to sink the Beeb. I probably won’t be around for the last
rites, but I can guarantee that when it happens, the world will have lost one
of the greatest institutions in the history of mankind.
On the note of not being around, I suppose I have to ‘fess
up! I have been receiving all sorts of
messages on the quiet back channels, asking me why on earth I am doing this
short, sharp walk, when I had intended to do the Coast-to-Coast instead? They
are also questioning the slightly dark content of this blog, compared to its
exultantly gleeful predecessors. The reason is that I am going into hospital
for a serious operation at the end of the month. My prostate cancer has
returned and there is a small chance that by operating now, the consultant may
be able to remove the cancer using a robotic technique. There are serious risks
of morbidity and even mortality associated with the operation, given all the radiotherapy
and HIFU (high intensity focussed ultrasound) treatment I have had in the past;
but there is also a chance that it might work.
After much discussion in the family, and despite the risks, I have
decided to go ahead. Marion is coming
back from the US to hold my hand and Veronica and Mazzi will be staying with
Anna in London to cheer me on. The operation will be performed at the Royal
Marsden in London, so I couldn’t be in better hands all round.
At least after this little gallop, I’ll be fighting fit for
the op! Tomorrow evening, I’ll meet my
ever-suffering and always helpful Veronica at my final destination, Cromer. Her welcome presence will, as usual, delay the last post until we have returned home.
Brent geese in their thousands on the salt marsh
Unusually, a path through thick undergrowth
The salt marsh is extensive and reminiscent of the moors
Black-headed gull? (I thought it was more exotic!)
The walking was very comfortable, over springy marsh grass
Vessels sailing on dry land
The English will put anything in a sandwich!
Holiday walkers on the sea wall
Petronella marooned against the sea wall after the storm surge. With water now miles away, it won't be easy to float her
The Blakeney Hotel
An attractive street in Blakeney
Another vessel cast high and dry by the surge, but a different generation!
This is the life. I'll lie here on the banks of the sea wall looking at birds through my binocs, while you just lie there!
The so-called "closed" coastal path. People just ignored the sign, pulled down the fence and went for it. I followed them, I'm afraid! The path was fine....
The Cley windmill
Dear Kevin,
ReplyDeleteBy these walking blogs, you have found a magical way to keep in close contact with your far flung friends. I love reading them and looking at the pictures and listening to your thoughts on all sorts of things that take your fancy as you walk along the trails. Its almost like being beside you and listening to you prattle on! You will indeed be strong and fit for the operation and my prayers will be with you.
To be more prosaic... when I was a young geologist in Angola, the Spinola coup took place in Portugal. There was a local news blackout, and us foreigners were in the gleeful position of telling the Angolan Portuguese community that there had been a coup back in the metropole. They had no idea. Courtesy of the BBC!
What is the second mini-windmill for on the roof of the big windmill building?
Richard
Quite the contrary, Richard, it is a source of constant wonder that you take the trouble to read the prattle! As I mentioned, I spent hours listening to the world service. I remember listening to it with you in Namibia on that ill-fated and short-lived venture when we looked for diamonds in the desert, following your reverse-Augrabies theory. I remember listening to it at our little cottage in Betty's Bay, where just today my daughter, Anna, is in tears, leaving the cottage for the last time before it gets sold. Sad times, indeed, but happy memories!
DeleteKevin,
ReplyDeleteRef Richard's query about the second windmill on the main cap, isn't that the way that the main sail is turned to keep it into the wind? A bit like the tail rotor on a helicopter, except almost the reverse effect...
Chris
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteKevin,
ReplyDeleteAh, Kevin... it must be your rebellious upbringing that allows you to step over some Jobswurf's sign and not take off on a 10 mile diversion from the route...
Your final day! I am sure there will be the usual mix... elation at completion and sadness at not longer being out in the bracing air of Norfolk.
You are about to pass within a stone's throw of Holt, where, as I have bored you before, my Great Grandfather was born in 1859. So 12.5% of my DNA comes from they parts.
Safe journey home, and see you next week,
Chris
Chris, Yes well, if it makes you feel better, I did feel a slight tinge of guilt. Can it be that you English are finally making me into a responsible citizen, where one does things because they are right, not just because you get away with it? Surely not! And as for your DNA, I'll certainly be looking to see if any of it remains in the area. The clues will be intricate engineering design, extraordinary integrity, attention to detail, steam, opinion on all matters, distrust of the political establishment and an all-embracing sense of responsibility. Might be hard to find....
Delete